Thursday, May 28, 2015

English Standard

1. Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text

says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining

where the text leaves matters uncertain.


                                             Netanyahu challenges Obama on Iran

Pro:

  • Obama declined to attend, saying he could not be seen taking sides ahead of Israels March 17 election 
  • Obama has repeatedly pledged not to let Iran obtain a nuclear weapon and to take action if Tehran breaks the terms of any deal
Con:
  • Israel prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu isseued a warning to president Obama about the nuclear deal being negotiated with Iran.
  • Netanyahu's speech was organized by republican housekeeper John Boehner without consultation of the white house
  • Netanyahu was essentially " agitating for war"
  • His real focus was not on Iran anyway 
  • Netanyhu is playing a dangerous game

Stance:

      Netanyahu was palying a dangerous game on the negotiation over the nuclear deal with Iran. Iran's " breaout time" to develop nuclear weapons could set off a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Obama has repeatedly said not to let Iran get control of nuclear weapons.


No comments:

Post a Comment